22
Nov
09

Mary Healey’s observation

Nov. 16, I returned to courtroom 2 and saw my first woman defendant, a middle aged Mexican who was stopped for driving drunk without a license nor insurance nor legal residency. She was asking for bond. The judge noted that she had been deported from the U.S. in 2003 and returned, had considerable family in Chicago and owned a car. He set bond at $9500 and told her to return Nov. 23 in the afternoon. The guard from McHenry asked the two family members in the courtroom if they wanted to talk with her before she returned to jail and told them in what room they could meet her. I have been impressed each time with the courtesy the judge and the officers in court show to prisoners.

On other visits most of the prisoners were on TV and interpreters in the courtroom. This time the defendants were there and an interpreter on TV. Because the defendants were close to the judge, he and they spoke softly. I couldn’t hear well.

Next two young men came. The older one has been arrested 10 times for some violent offenses and some drug offenses; I couldn’t hear how many convictions. His lawyer on TV asked for a copy of the record which the judge ordered to be faxed to him and told them both to return Nov. 23.

The other, only 18, has been in the U.S. 15 years and still lives with his parents. From age 13 he has continually been in trouble with police, has spent time in the juvenile home, and belongs to a gang. He says that the same policeman arrested him repeatedly while he tried to stay out of trouble. He offered the fact that he has attended school as if that extenuates his burglaries and batteries. No member of his extended family is a permanent resident. He is ineligible for permanent residency because of a cocaine conviction. The judge ordered him deported to Mexico .

Five men who are out on bond were supposed to come next. Two showed up on time, one with a lawyer. Two more came late. The fifth came very late after the proceedings had begun. They all needed the Spanish interpreter. The lawyer apparently had just been hired and spent the time filling out forms; she asked for time to prepare. Three of the other four said they wanted lawyers and were given lists. A fifth said he would defend himself. The judge advised him to think it over. All were told to return Dec. 8.

Mary Healey

Advertisements

0 Responses to “Mary Healey’s observation”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: